Why traders are abandoning NFTs for high-turnover memecoins
NFTs used to be the loudest narrative in crypto. Collections minted out in seconds, trading floors were buzzing, and every other day a new project promised to be “the next blue chip.” Today, that energy has clearly shifted. Volumes are thinner, trading is slower, and many market participants who once lived on NFT marketplaces are now glued to memecoin charts instead — especially on Solana.
This doesn’t mean traders have lost their appetite for risk. On the contrary, they are still aggressively speculating, but the arena has changed. High-turnover memecoins now capture much of the attention that once belonged to NFTs, and structural differences between the two markets explain why.
NFT trading is shrinking — and concentrating
Over the last year, NFT market activity has cooled noticeably. Instead of wild spikes and euphoric surges, trading across major marketplaces looks flatter and more subdued. Occasional bursts of volume still appear around hot mints or hyped collections, but they are far less frequent than during the peak NFT mania.
What’s more important is where the remaining activity is going. A small group of large marketplaces now dominate virtually all NFT trading. A few top platforms capture the lion’s share of volume, while smaller venues contribute only a negligible fraction. This consolidation suggests that overall interest is shrinking and that traders are clustering around the most liquid, safest-feeling platforms.
For active traders, thinner order books and fewer participants on smaller NFT platforms translate into worse execution and more risk. Many decide it’s simply not worth the effort unless they are operating on the largest marketplaces, and even there, the action often feels muted compared to the past.
NFTs have lost their “momentum market” feel
The cooling of activity has also changed the experience of NFT trading itself. In the past, collections could see sharp price re-ratings within hours as social buzz translated almost instantly into buying pressure. Quick flips were common, and holders knew they could often exit into strong demand.
Today, the dynamic is different. Listings sit longer, floor prices update more slowly, and aggressive bidding has become rarer. Traders who crave constant feedback — the rush of frequent wins and losses — find this pace too slow. In an environment where sentiment changes quickly, holding illiquid JPEGs that might take days or weeks to offload no longer feels attractive.
That doesn’t signal the end of NFTs as an asset class, but it does explain why they are no longer at the center of speculative activity. The spotlight has swung to assets that offer speed, constant engagement, and lower friction: memecoins.
Memecoins: Still noisy, still liquid
While NFTs fade from the front pages, memecoins continue to record significant turnover. Large-cap names such as Dogecoin, Shiba Inu, and Pepe regularly register massive daily volumes even on relatively calm market days. Those numbers highlight a key point: speculative capital hasn’t disappeared, it has migrated.
On top of the established names, a rolling wave of new memecoins attracts traders each week. Many of these fresh tokens will never build long-term value, yet they often generate intense, short-lived trading activity. For momentum-driven players, that’s the entire point: they’re not looking to marry a project, just date it for a volatile couple of hours.
The memecoin market acts as a perpetual casino floor. There is always a new chart to watch, another ticker pumping, a different narrative trending. This constant rotation suits traders who want to stay “in the game” all day with minimal downtime.
Why Solana became the epicenter
Among the various networks hosting these tokens, Solana has emerged as a clear hot spot. A striking number of the most actively traded memecoins are either native to Solana or see substantial liquidity on the network. That is not a coincidence.
Solana offers extremely low transaction fees and near-instant settlement, both of which are tailor-made for high-frequency speculative trading. When your cost per trade is negligible, it becomes feasible to jump in and out of positions many times a day, scale into or out of micro-caps, and test new narratives without worrying that fees will eat up your gains.
Crucially, many Solana-based memecoins show high turnover relative to their market cap. They are not primarily “buy and hold” instruments; they are chips on a fast-moving table. Frequent trading keeps volumes elevated and encourages more participants to join, creating a feedback loop of liquidity and speculation that NFTs currently struggle to match.
From collectibles to chips: what traders actually want
At its core, the rotation away from NFTs and toward memecoins is less about specific assets and more about how traders want to participate in the market. After the NFT mania dimmed, many speculators reevaluated what they were really seeking: fast feedback, constant opportunities, low entry thresholds, and the ability to exit at a moment’s notice.
Memecoins check all those boxes:
– Speed: Prices can move dramatically in minutes, delivering rapid outcomes (good or bad).
– Flexibility: Position sizes can range from a few dollars to substantial bets, with easy scaling.
– Engagement: There is always something happening — new launches, social buzz, micro-trends.
– Accessible liquidity: It is generally easier to hit market buy/sell on a memecoin than to find a buyer for a specific NFT at a target floor.
NFTs, by contrast, often require higher upfront costs (one full token per item), longer holding periods, and more research into teams, art, and roadmaps. For those who primarily chase volatility rather than long-term narratives or cultural value, that slower, research-heavy model is less appealing.
The scale advantage: small traders stay in play
An important shift concerns accessibility for smaller capital bases. Memecoins allow traders with modest funds to remain active participants in a way that is much harder in the NFT market.
Buying even a single NFT from a recognized collection can demand a significant amount of capital. For many retail traders, that level of commitment to one illiquid asset feels risky. In contrast, memecoins can be bought in tiny slices, diversified across several tokens, and traded frequently without large absolute exposure.
This structure lets smaller traders participate in the speculative game without tying up too much money in any one position. Even if much of this activity is driven by “fun” or impulsive decisions, it increases turnover and keeps memecoins front and center in the attention economy.
Why NFTs struggle to compete on turnover
NFTs face several structural hurdles that make it difficult to compete with memecoins as instruments of rapid speculation:
1. Non-fungibility: Each NFT is unique, which is great for art and collectibles but bad for quick, highly liquid trading. Order books are fragmented across many individual items.
2. Pricing opacity: Determining fair value for a specific NFT often requires detailed collection knowledge. By comparison, a memecoin has a single, clear market price.
3. Higher slippage and friction: Moving into and out of NFTs usually involves greater slippage and time delays. Listings, offers, cancellations, and negotiations take longer than a simple token swap.
4. Narrative fatigue: Many NFT projects promised metaverses, games, and utility that never fully materialized. Traders have become more skeptical of long-term roadmaps and more interested in immediate, tradable catalysts.
These factors combine to make NFTs feel “heavy” compared to the nimble, frictionless experience of memecoin speculation.
What could bring attention back to NFTs?
The current rotation does not mean NFTs are doomed. It does, however, indicate that for NFTs to regain a central role in speculative markets, they may need to evolve in several directions:
– Better liquidity mechanisms: More robust NFT AMMs, fractionalization, or fungible representations of collections could reduce the liquidity gap.
– Clearer utility and revenue models: Projects that provide tangible on-chain benefits, access, or cashflows might attract more serious capital.
– Integration with DeFi: Deeper NFT use in lending, collateralization, and structured products could create new demand and more active usage.
– Shift beyond speculation: As NFTs find stronger use cases in gaming, identity, and ticketing, attention may diversify from pure flipping to functional adoption.
If those improvements occur, NFTs may once again compete with memecoins for trader attention — not just as collectibles, but as components of a broader financial stack.
The risk calculus: fast fun, fast losses
The move into memecoins also reflects a change in how some traders perceive and manage risk. On the surface, NFTs might look “safer” because many are tied to recognizable brands or communities, while memecoins are often openly speculative jokes. Yet the liquidity profile creates a different kind of risk: being stuck.
With memecoins, the danger is more direct and visible: a token can crash 50–90% in hours. However, traders know they can usually exit quickly at the prevailing price, even if it is painful. With illiquid NFTs, the risk is more subtle: you might not find a buyer at all, or only at a huge discount after a long wait.
For traders who prioritize optionality — the ability to change their mind swiftly — the former type of risk feels more manageable than the latter, pushing them toward fungible tokens.
Final thoughts: chasing motion, not just narratives
The shift from NFTs to high-turnover memecoins reveals something fundamental about crypto markets: speculation chases motion. Wherever the most intense activity, volatility, and liquidity converge, that is where traders tend to gather.
Right now, that intersection lies in memecoins, particularly on fast and cheap networks like Solana. Low fees, rapid settlement, and an endless carousel of new tokens provide exactly the kind of environment short-term participants want.
NFTs have not disappeared, but they are no longer the default playground for risk-takers. Until NFT markets can match — or meaningfully complement — the speed and flexibility of memecoin trading, traders looking for action are likely to keep favoring fungible tokens over digital collectibles.
—
This text is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. Trading or investing in cryptocurrencies, NFTs, or memecoins involves a high level of risk, including the possible loss of all capital. Always conduct your own research and carefully consider your financial situation and risk tolerance before making any trading decisions.