Death cross vs. $96K rebound: where Bitcoin stands now
Bitcoin enters the final days of November clinging to levels just under 90,000 dollars, with the market torn between fear of a deeper correction and hope for a sharp rebound toward 96,000–100,000. After a violent drop to 80,500 last week, the leading cryptocurrency is trying to stabilize while traders reassess their outlook for the rest of the year.
At the moment, the 88,000 zone is acting as a stubborn ceiling. Every attempt to push higher has met selling pressure, leaving BTC locked in a narrow but tense range. This stalemate is reflected in positioning: some market participants are openly calling for a prolonged downtrend, while others see signs that a local bottom may already be forming.
Short‑term technicals offer a bit of relief. On the four‑hour chart, Bitcoin has reclaimed the 20‑period simple moving average (SMA‑20) for the first time in two weeks, a minor but notable shift suggesting that intraday momentum has stopped bleeding lower and is attempting to turn. For short‑term traders, this reclaim often marks the transition from freefall to consolidation.
On higher timeframes, however, the picture is more complicated. One popular analyst argues that the weekly structure of the trend remains intact in spite of a decisive breakdown of key support. Throughout the current cycle, Bitcoin had largely held above its so‑called Bull Market Support Band, with only brief dips below it. The recent sell‑off, though, has opened a gap of more than 20,000 dollars between spot price and this band, meaning that it would now take a powerful rally just to retest those levels.
Despite this technical damage, some well‑known traders see encouraging signs on the three‑day chart. One prominent market participant described Bitcoin’s latest three‑day candle as “great,” pointing out that such formations often appear near market bottoms. With sentiment and several indicators now more stretched than they were during the FTX collapse in late 2022, he projects a possible trading range between 90,000 and 96,000 in the coming week. Back then, the fallout from the exchange’s implosion marked the final capitulation of the previous bear market; the comparison suggests that current conditions could be similarly climactic.
—
1. Death cross: ominous signal or contrarian buy zone?
A key storyline this month is the emergence of a fresh “death cross” on the daily BTC/USD chart. This pattern, which occurs when the 50‑day simple moving average falls below the 200‑day SMA, triggered on 15 November. Traditionally, such a crossover is interpreted as a bearish omen hinting at extended downside.
Yet historical performance is more nuanced. In several past cycles, Bitcoin has actually printed local lows around the time of a death cross, with price staging substantial bounces afterward. One well‑followed commentator highlighted that prior death crosses often coincided with exhaustion of selling rather than its beginning.
The same analyst, however, warned that if a rebound fails to appear quickly, the situation could deteriorate further. His scenario: should Bitcoin stay pinned down without a convincing bounce for roughly a week after the signal, another leg lower becomes likely, followed by a rally back toward the 200‑day SMA. In that case, the 200‑day average — currently near 110,130 dollars — might cap the recovery and establish a macro lower high, effectively confirming that the bull market has given way to a longer‑lasting downtrend.
For traders, this makes the current period critical. A swift push away from recent lows would keep the bullish narrative alive; continued lethargy or another breakdown could morph the death cross from a contrarian opportunity into the start of a deeper structural decline.
—
2. Weekly trendlines turn from support into resistance
Beyond the daily chart, weekly moving averages are also exerting pressure. About two weeks ago, Bitcoin lost the 50‑week exponential moving average (EMA) on a closing basis, something not seen since March 2023. That break rattled many market participants, as the 50‑week EMA had served as a dependable dynamic floor during much of the current cycle.
Subsequent analysis shows that this 50‑week EMA now lines up closely with a long‑term macro downtrend line, creating a powerful confluence of resistance. When a widely watched moving average aligns with a multi‑year trendline, it tends to attract even more attention from traders and algorithms alike.
The implication is clear: if and when Bitcoin recovers enough to challenge this zone, the market will face a critical decision point. A clean breakout above the combined resistance could reignite talk of a renewed bull phase. A rejection, in contrast, would reinforce the idea that rallies are opportunities to sell into strength rather than signs of sustainable upside.
—
3. Long‑term holders sell, speculators step in
Price turbulence has triggered a major reshuffle in who holds Bitcoin. Fresh on‑chain research indicates that long‑term holders (LTHs) — investors who have kept their coins for more than 155 days — are offloading significant amounts of BTC. At the same time, short‑term holders (STHs), who have held their coins for less than 155 days and are generally seen as more speculative, are absorbing these coins.
The 30‑day rolling position change for these two groups paints a stark contrast: LTH balances are shrinking, while STH balances are expanding. Put simply, seasoned investors are distributing coins into weakness, and newer participants are eagerly buying what they sell. The net transfer between these groups has reached about 63,000 BTC.
This kind of handover often happens during periods of heightened volatility, where experienced holders take profits or reduce risk, while latecomers — sometimes driven by emotion or headlines — step in. The fact that short‑term holders are accumulating “at high prices,” rather than bargain levels, underscores the speculative nature of the current wave of demand.
For the broader market, this shift cuts both ways. On one hand, coins moving from patient hands to more reactive ones can increase volatility, as STHs are more likely to panic‑sell on further drops. On the other, capitulation by long‑term holders has historically been associated with late‑cycle shakeouts that eventually produce durable bottoms.
—
4. Macro data and Thanksgiving week: a compressed test of risk appetite
This week’s action unfolds against a dense backdrop of macroeconomic releases compressed into a shortened trading schedule around Thanksgiving in the United States. Such periods frequently amplify moves in risk assets, as liquidity is lower while key data hits in quick succession.
For Bitcoin, this means that macro surprises — whether in inflation readings, employment data or growth figures — could trigger outsized reactions. A cooler‑than‑expected inflation print, for example, might spark renewed optimism on interest‑rate cuts, boosting appetite for speculative assets such as crypto. Conversely, signs of persistent inflation or weakening growth could deepen fears of stagflation and push traders toward cash and safe havens.
The juxtaposition is particularly striking right now: traditional equity markets have slumped into what many sentiment gauges describe as “extreme fear,” even as crypto‑specific sentiment indices show a rebound in optimism after the latest BTC drawdown. That divergence raises the question of whether digital assets are front‑running a recovery in risk appetite — or merely staging a temporary bounce before aligning with broader market stress.
—
5. Sentiment flips: from despair to cautious optimism
Following the plunge to 80,500 dollars, sentiment around Bitcoin was deeply negative, with social and derivative metrics pointing to capitulation‑like conditions. Yet as price stabilized and nudged back toward the mid‑80,000s and above, mood indicators began to recover.
A growing number of bulls now talk about reclaiming the psychological 90,000 level as a base and then challenging 96,000 in the short term, with 100,000 once again appearing in trading plans as a realistic upside target rather than a distant fantasy. The idea is not that the crash is forgotten, but that the worst of the forced selling may be over.
Derivatives markets reinforce this mixed but improving picture. Funding rates and open interest have normalized from extremes seen during the peak of the sell‑off, suggesting that the most aggressive leveraged bets have been flushed out. However, the absence of extreme short positioning also means there is less “short squeeze” fuel available to propel a violent recovery if spot buying alone is insufficient.
—
What this means for different types of market participants
For long‑term investors, the current setup is a classic moment of tension between conviction and fear. The death cross, loss of the 50‑week EMA and ongoing distribution by veteran holders would normally be viewed as warning signs. At the same time, historical patterns of bottom formation, intense negative sentiment and structural shifts in ownership can all precede significant multi‑month rallies.
Portfolio managers with a long horizon may focus less on precise timing around 80,500–90,000 and more on whether the long‑term thesis — such as limited supply and growing institutional adoption — remains intact. Volatility at these levels can be seen either as a threat to capital or as an opportunity to accumulate, depending on risk tolerance and existing exposure.
Short‑term traders, by contrast, are likely to focus on clearly defined levels. On the downside, last week’s 80,500 low now marks critical support; a clean break beneath it could accelerate selling and invite a test of lower zones. On the upside, the 88,000 ceiling and then the 90,000–96,000 band stand out as immediate resistance and profit‑taking areas. Beyond that, the 100,000 and 110,000–111,000 regions, where major moving averages cluster, are potential inflection points for any larger recovery.
Risk management is especially important in this environment. Rapid sentiment swings, a crowded macro calendar, and concentrated ownership in speculative short‑term hands increase the probability of sharp intraday reversals. Traders who survived the latest crash often did so by sizing positions conservatively, using clear invalidation levels, and avoiding excessive leverage in the face of uncertainty.
—
How the current setup compares to past cycle turning points
Drawing parallels with the FTX‑era lows is tempting, but the backdrop today is different in several crucial aspects. Back then, the market was emerging from a long bear market, liquidity had dried up across the industry, and confidence in centralized platforms was severely shaken. The FTX collapse felt like the final blow after a year of relentless downside.
Today’s environment is, on the surface, more constructive: institutional infrastructure is more developed, regulatory clarity is slowly improving in several jurisdictions, and derivatives and spot markets are deeper. If the present sell‑off proves to be a mid‑cycle correction rather than a cycle‑ending capitulation, the path to new highs could be shorter — but so could the patience of market participants expecting quick gains.
What remains similar is the psychology. In both cases, traders face a confusing mix of conflicting signals: scary technical breakdowns alongside potentially bottoming patterns, aggressive selling from seasoned holders alongside voracious buying from speculators, and macro uncertainty layered on top of internal market stress. Navigating such periods has rarely been easy, but they often define the trajectories of the next major moves.
—
Possible scenarios for the weeks ahead
From the current vantage point, several broad paths stand out:
1. Bullish rebound scenario
Bitcoin defends the 80,500 low, breaks decisively above 88,000, and uses 90,000 as a springboard toward 96,000 and possibly back over 100,000. In this case, the death cross would once again be remembered as a contrarian signal marking a local bottom, and the transfer of coins to short‑term holders could fuel a powerful short‑to‑medium‑term rally.
2. Grinding recovery with macro headwinds
BTC ranges between roughly 80,500 and 96,000, reacting sharply to each major macro data release but failing to establish a clear trend. Long‑term holders continue to reduce risk, while short‑term investors trade the range. Sentiment oscillates between fear and cautious optimism without a decisive breakout.
3. Deeper correction and lower high at the 200‑day SMA
A failure to bounce convincingly in the near term leads to another sell‑off, pushing price below recent lows. After a period of capitulation, Bitcoin recovers toward the 200‑day SMA around 110,130, but stalls there, confirming a macro lower high. This would suggest that the broader bull structure has given way to a more extended downtrend.
Which of these paths plays out will depend on a complex interaction between technical levels, on‑chain behavior, macroeconomic surprises and, ultimately, trader psychology. For now, Bitcoin stands at a crossroads: caught between the shadow of a death cross and the prospect of a rebound toward 96,000 and beyond, with Thanksgiving week’s data and shifting holder dynamics poised to tip the balance.